The benefits to some would be the condo owners and
the people who live in the condos. The harms to others would be the condo
employees. The rights to be exercised would be the condo owners and the owners
of the condos. The rights denied would be the condo employees. The moral
problem would be that the condo owners wanted to fire the condo maintenance
worker to replace with a new worker to save $35,000 a year due to economic
constraints. The economic outcomes would be saving $35,000 a year. Yes this
action would save $35,000 but it’s not worth the investment in the long-term. By
the time you figure out the cost savings per unit of the condo the residents
are only saving $10 a month which is not that much. Why would the company want
to risk new people that you don’t know anything about that could potential
destroy the condos? They should just stay with the existing company since there
is no complaints. There are not really any legal requirements. This moral
problem violates the long- term interest, the universal rule, and the
contributive liberty ethical duties. I would not fire the condo employees.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment